In “Why Self-publishing Versus Traditional Publishing Doesn’t Matter” I pointed out that both options have the potential to satisfy the core needs of a writer seeking publication. Writers must carefully consider the pros and cons of each option before pursuing either one. The next four posts will consider some of these issues.
To start the discussion, here are five reasons why a writer should go with a traditional publisher:
1) Wider Distribution: Traditional publishers have distribution avenues that are effectively not available to self-published books. Sure, there are work-around solutions, but they’re limited and require much time and effort. Traditional publishers handle the distribution; easy peasy.
2) An Advance: Traditional publishers provide an advance. Self-publishers don’t. While the advances are getting smaller, they still exist.
3) More Prestige: An author of a traditionally published book earns greater respect and garners more esteem.
4) Higher Quality: Traditional publishers generally produce a higher quality product. There are more eyes looking at it to catch errors.
5) They Do the Heavy Lifting: What about e-books, hard cover and paperback, press releases, cover designs, ISBN and bar codes, back cover material and author photos? A traditional publisher handles all these items. There’s nothing for the author to master or worry about; traditional publishers make it happen.
Given all this, why would anyone want to self-publish? Next week, we’ll consider why.
What would you add to this list?